A bill passed by the National Assembly, establishing a presumption of self-defense for law enforcement officers when they use their firearms, has sparked intense controversy. Nearly 600,000 people have signed a petition opposing it.

Presumption of self-defense for police officers: the LDH and left-wing associations denounce a dangerous text
Presumption of self-defense for police officers: the LDH and left-wing associations denounce a dangerous text

A bill passed by the National Assembly, establishing a presumption of self-defense for law enforcement officers when they use their firearms, has sparked intense controversy. Nearly 600,000 people have signed a petition opposing it.

The text is deeply divisive. Adopted by the National Assembly, it establishes the principle that a police officer or gendarme who uses their firearm would benefit from a presumption of self-defense. Opponents consider this provision particularly serious.

Nathalie Téhio, president of the League of Human Rights (LDH), denounces what she calls a "license to kill." For her, automatically granting the benefit of self-defense to law enforcement officers amounts to removing their actions from any effective judicial oversight.

Citizen mobilization against this text is gaining momentum: the petition launched to demand its rejection has collected nearly 600,000 signatures to date, demonstrating widespread opposition within the population.

Community

Comments

Comments are open, but protected against spam. Initial posts and comments containing links undergo manual review.

Be the first to comment on this article.

Respond to this article

Comments are moderated. Promotional messages, automated emails, and abusive links are blocked.

Your first comment, or any message containing a link, may be placed pending approval.