In family businesses, love often gets mixed up with the bills, and when the couple separates, accounts are sometimes settled in court. The Court of Cassation has just clarified a point that poisons many separations: to have the status of "employee spouse" recognized, it is not necessary to prove a subordinate relationship, even when the business owner spouse manages the company.
The case originated from a dental surgery practice run through a company: after the breakup, the ex-wife requested recognition of an employment contract, putting forward two concrete elements, regular participation in the activity and remuneration paid, which she claimed was not declared to social organizations due to the lack of action by her ex-spouse.
A status that survives divorce
A status that survives divorce. The Court of Appeal had opened the door by recalling that a spouse who works "effectively and habitually" beyond simple assistance can be considered an employee without being required to demonstrate that they obeyed like any other employee. Then it closed it again as soon as a company became involved, ruling that, when faced with a managing spouse, subordination still had to be proven.
The highest court dismissed this distinction: the subordinate relationship "is not a condition" of the status and it applies "even" when the spouse manages the company. Behind this wording lies a signal for the everyday economy, for businesses, offices, and small structures: declaring the spouse's status—collaborator, employee, or partner—is not a trivial formality, and yesterday's oversights become tomorrow's disputes, with social rights at stake and a potential cost that knows no respite.
Community
Comments
Comments are open, but protected against spam. Initial posts and comments containing links undergo manual review.
Be the first to comment on this article.