Candace Owens is not giving up. Despite the threats from the Elysée, despite the silence of Brigitte and Emmanuel Macron about their private life, despite the lack of evidence, the 35-year-old American political columnist is releasing several investigative videos that are supposed to reveal the secrets of the Macron couple... Interview watched them.
After 3 episodes, let's be clear, don't waste your time, we're not learning anything. Nothing factual, in any case. Barroom blah blah, that, indeed, you'll get. Anecdotes in gossip mode, invisible evidence, conspiracy theories, victimization... The subject does not do justice to Candace Owens, who had made a name for herself in the United States for a few years.
In episode 3, broadcast on Friday and already with 1,3M views on Youtube, Candace Owens wants to confront us with " a large number of coincidences". She examines in particular the book "Revolution" by Emmanuel Macron. We would like to be convinced by her investigation and the revelation of scoops, it is not the case. She teases, she surfs on this hot topic on X and ultimately reveals nothing. Or not much.
Candace Owens interprets family events according to his own experience and his very American vision of the world. Nothing else. She knows nothing about France, especially not that of the 20th century that she is trying to decipher. No facts, no proof, only shortcuts and suppositions.
She is not actually trying to show us that Brigitte Macron is a man, she wants to force us to believe her nonsense, whatever the cost. Even without an obvious link or a powerful argument.
Because Brigitte Macron made a mistake in the year when speaking publicly about the death of a niece, she would therefore be a man! A curious shortcut.
Because Brigitte Macron said that her father had been " buried on December 24 " while he was " cremated on December 28", is there a scam? Candace Owens is pushing the limits of stupidity. It's not even conspiracy.
In episode 2, who are " an inaccessible past"Candace Owens is already bordering on ridiculous. Interview analyzed episode 1 with amazement, 2 is a panoply of shortcuts and confirmation biases too.
Candace Owens is notably able to show several photos of Brigitte Macron, when she was younger. Then to explain that it is " It was surprising to see that she was still hiding her neck." And so ? What does this prove? Especially as you can see with the screenshot below, the First Lady's neck is absolutely not hidden in each photo presented...
Questioning, being curious, analyzing, all of this is good in today's society. But pretending to have investigated a subject of private life, highlighting supposed revelations to finally offer a sad spectacle in front of the camera episode after episode... This is called clickbait, useless buzz and defamation. Will we really have to put up with episode 4? Candace Owens is on the ropes. It's up to her to respond with some very real evidence.
40 minutes of video interspersed with Candace Owens advertising promos, that's the only scam we've seen so far.
