US allies in Europe are concerned about a possible hastily concluded framework agreement with Iran, fearing that a superficial accord could further complicate long-term negotiations. Several diplomats believe such an approach could lead to a lasting technical impasse.
According to sources involved in the discussions with Tehran, Washington might be tempted to quickly conclude an agreement in order to claim a diplomatic victory for the president. Donald TrumpBut such a strategy, they argue, risks leaving essential questions related to the Iranian nuclear program unanswered.
Numerous technical disagreements remain, particularly regarding the level of uranium enrichment and the procedures for lifting sanctions. These sensitive issues could require months, or even years, of further negotiations if they are not properly resolved from the outset.
"The problem is not the lack of agreement. The problem is that a bad initial agreement creates countless problems later on," warned a senior European diplomat, reflecting concerns shared among European capitals.
For its part, Iran is demanding solid guarantees, while the Europeans want to be more involved in the negotiation process. This divergence in approach further complicates the search for a comprehensive compromise.
The White House rejected these criticisms, defending its strategy and negotiating team. But amid heightened geopolitical tensions, fears of a poorly calibrated agreement continue to fuel debate among Western allies.
Community
Comments
Comments are open, but protected against spam. Initial posts and comments containing links undergo manual review.
Be the first to comment on this article.