French companies: worrying closures despite a slight uptick in new business creation
French companies: worrying closures despite a slight uptick in new business creation

The end of 2025 confirms the enduring fragility of the French economic fabric. Between October 1st and December 31st, more than 112,000 businesses were struck off the commercial registers, an unprecedented level reflecting a profound deterioration in the situation of economic structures. According to data published in early January, these deregistrations increased by more than 27% year-on-year, a rate that is fueling concern among observers and economic stakeholders. Deregistration constitutes the final stage in the administrative disappearance of a company. Behind these figures lie diverse realities. A significant proportion of the entities concerned are micro-enterprises, real estate companies, or family businesses that do not always engage in traditional economic activity. However, even taking this diversity into account, the scale of the phenomenon testifies to a tense economic climate, marked by squeezed margins, high costs, and reduced visibility on medium-term prospects. The increase in deregistrations is not limited to a few isolated regions. It affects the majority of metropolitan regions, indicating a widespread phenomenon. However, some areas are experiencing particularly sharp increases. The Grand Est region has seen a dramatic surge, with an increase of nearly 80% year-on-year. Normandy, Hauts-de-France, and Centre-Val de Loire are also experiencing very significant rises, exceeding 60% in some cases. These regions, already weakened by industrial restructuring or complex demographic trends, appear particularly vulnerable to current economic pressures. Île-de-France, which concentrates a major share of the national business community, is not spared. Business closures there have increased by nearly 40%, confirming that the decline is affecting both the most dynamic areas and those undergoing economic restructuring. This geographical spread reinforces the perception of a structural crisis, beyond sectoral or local effects.

Collective proceedings remain numerous despite a slight rebalancing

Alongside deregistration, the number of companies entering insolvency proceedings remains high. In the last quarter of 2025, more than 17,000 entities were affected by such proceedings, representing a moderate but steady increase compared to the previous year. This trend reflects persistent cash flow and profitability difficulties, particularly for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) facing rising financing costs and a slowdown in demand. Liquidation proceedings remain the most frequently initiated procedure. Nearly 12,000 liquidations were recorded during the period, although their number decreased slightly compared to the end of 2024. This relative decline, however, is not enough to reverse the overall trend. Meanwhile, reorganization proceedings continue to rise, with more than 4,800 new cases opened. This increase can be interpreted as a sign of a desire to safeguard certain businesses, but it also highlights the growing number of critical situations requiring judicial intervention.

In this context, business creation does not provide insufficient support

Despite an increase of approximately 10% compared to the previous year, these figures do not offset the volume of business closures. The gap between entries and exits from the business landscape therefore remains negative, exacerbating the net contraction in the number of active companies. Observers believe this situation reflects a combination of unfavorable factors. The gradual phasing out of certain support measures implemented during previous crises, the tightening of credit conditions, and overall economic uncertainty are having a lasting impact on companies' ability to survive. While some adjustments are expected in 2026, data from the last quarter of 2025 suggest that this period of vulnerability is far from over. In this tense economic climate, the increasing number of closures appears as a warning sign. It raises questions about the resilience of the French business sector and the capacity of public policies to provide sustained support to the most vulnerable companies, beyond emergency measures.