— Global: Refreshment breaks, a blatant pretext for broadcasting advertisements, are already irritating viewers
Global: Refreshment breaks, a blatant pretext for advertising, are already annoying viewers

The World Cup has barely begun, and one of its new features is already causing controversy. During the opening match between Mexico and South Africa, a water break lasted longer than expected for an embarrassing reason: the commercial break airing in the United States hadn't finished. The South African players had to wait before resuming play. Not because of a medical issue. Not because of an incident on the field. But because Fox, the American broadcaster of the match, hadn't finished its commercial break.

A health measure that has already been discredited

Officially, these cooling breaks are meant to protect the players. They're supposed to allow teams to hydrate, recover briefly, and avoid the risks associated with the heat. But from the very first match, the system gives a completely different impression. When a break meant to protect the players' health is extended to allow for advertising, the health argument loses all credibility.

Football bent to the rhythm of television

The problem is that football doesn't handle breaks well. A half lasts 45 minutes, without any natural advertising interruptions. For broadcasters, especially American ones, this is a format that's difficult to make profitable. Cooling breaks change that. They give channels a usable slot for advertising. And when the resumption of play depends on the end of a commercial break, the line between sporting necessity and commercial interest disappears.

The players wait, the viewers tune out

On the pitch, the effect is immediate: the rhythm is disrupted. Players lose their focus. A team can lose momentum. The match becomes disjointed. In front of the screen, the result is just as bad. Viewers quickly realize that the break is primarily a marketing ploy. The World Cup aimed to introduce these "cooling breaks." Instead, it has sparked a much more heated debate: how far can the game be interrupted to satisfy television audiences? Between this and the risk of a tedious group stage due to the large number of teams and their varying skill levels, the World Cup is off to a mixed start…